Part I:  Introduction

Two police arrests in the 2020s are studied for both similarities and differences.

Let us call the first Arrestee “X” and the second Arrestee “Y.”

Part II:  Similarities

1. Both X and Y are arrested because several policemen are called to the scene after a ‘report’ of violence.
2. Both X and Y are eventually hand-cuffed by the arresting group of police officers.
3. Both sets of police officers are equipped with body-cams to record their actions after police first arrive.
4. Both arrestees die.
5. In both cases, the arrestee who dies repeatedly claims ‘I can’t breathe.’
6. In each case, the police officers meticulously follow standard police procedures and their ‘training’ in same.

Part III:  Differences

1. X is being arrested for committing violence to a third-party – a pregnant woman. Y is arrested by being accused of Racial Discrimination by a disputant.
2. In the case of X, cell phone pictures by screaming onlookers on the street create an almost instantaneous World-Wide SCANDAL by being INCOMPLETELY and CONTINUALLY broadcast World-Wide. In the case of Y, the incident occurs in December 2025 with NO World-Wide broadcast of anything – including the actual death at the scene.
3. X is violently resisting arrest. Y is immobile and propped up in a sitting position by the father of the disputant.  The disputant’s mother removes and hides the large murder knife.  One or more members of the disputant’s family accuses the (dying) victim of RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (a very serious Political Protocol CRIME).
4. When X is finally subdued and arrested, an ambulance is called after his arrest. In the case of Y, the disputant (murderer) chased Y after a presumed verbal dispute, stabbing him twice in the legs (to bring him down) and then stabbing him in the chest area severing an artery.
5. X dies after the first-responders take custody of him. Y dies at the scene after telling the police officers, who hand-cuffed and arrested him: “I cannot breathe.”  (One of the police officers calls him a liar shortly before he bleeds to death.)
6. The incomplete story and pictures of the arrest of X ‘SPARKS’ months of unconstrained violent INSURRECTIONS (World-Wide) during which thirty or more perpetually anonymous people are MURDERED by ‘Mostly Peaceful Protestors and Demonstrators.” The NEWS story of Y only shows up in May 2026, after the murderer (and his assistant mother) are convicted at trial – with virtually no EVIL SCUMBAG PRESS publicity World-Wide.
7. In the case of X, the arresting police officer is tried and convicted both in state and Federal court. At the state trial, a Racist Racial Racketeer Congresswoman from out of state (in California) leads a MOB outside the courthouse terrifying jurors going in and out of court SCREAMING FOR BLOOD.  Marxist-trained organized ‘Protest’ leaders become instant millionaires.  In the case of Y, a jury of eight women and four men convict the murderer in less than two days deliberation.

Part IV:  Scientific Pathologist’s Reports of Cause of Death

1. In the case of X, the Pathologist’s report is unconstitutionally withheld from the trial of the police officer. Only after the conviction is it revealed (with minimal EVIL SCUMBAG PRESS reportage) that X died from a self-administered illegal drug overdose.  In the case of Y, long before the trial of the murderer, the Pathologist ‘EXONERATED’ the police under the theory that Y (while in handcuffs) was bleeding to death so it is speculatively considered unlikely that earlier calls for first responders could have saved his life.  That is a total speculation!

Part V:  Major Contrasts

1. X was a Black middle-aged, violent career criminal and the prosecuted arresting officer was white. Y was a (White) Anglo-Polish teenager and his murderer (and family) was Sikh (Indian Immigrants) to the UK.
2. BLM is a RACIAL RACKETEERING INDUSTRY created and run by Marxist millionaires. Henry Nowak was an Anglo-Polish student.

Part IV:  Moral Conclusions 

If you sincerely believe the unbridled Hard-Left Islamic Alliance EVIL SCUMBAG PRESS are empowered by the (Internationalized) First Amendment Free Press, then you are an ENABLER AND YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM.